Case Studies › Food & Beverage
Case StudyBoiler PretreatmentFood ManufacturingIndependent · No Chemistry Sold

Softener vs. deaerator? Softener AND deaerator. Technical intervention saves a boiler system.

A growing food manufacturer moved from an old building into a new, larger production facility and brought its firetube steam boilers with it. The mechanical contractor installed the boilers and a recommended deaerator, but no other pretreatment, on hard Chicago city water. Within weeks the deaerator was scaling over every few days, feedwater oxygen was high, and no treatment residual would hold in the boilers. The contractor blamed the water treatment company and voided the new-equipment warranty. The water treatment company said it was mechanical. The plant asked for an independent review.

Asset
Firetube steam boilers + deaerator
The Dispute
Mechanical vs. chemical
Hidden Finding
No softener, choked DA vent
Residuals
0 → on target
Outcome
~$98K equipment avoided
Challenge — What Was Happening

Dissolved oxygen in the boiler feedwater was high and the deaerator scaled over every few days, forcing repeated cleanouts. Blowdown samples showed no sulfite, no phosphate, and no polymer residual, no matter how much product went in.

The mechanical contractor blamed the water treatment program and voided the warranty on the new equipment. The water treatment company was adamant the problem was mechanical. Each side had a position. Nobody had a root cause.

Meanwhile the plant was running a growing production line on boilers that were scaling and an oxygen-control system that was not controlling oxygen.

Intervention — What We Did

The facility asked Industrial Water Advisory for a third-party review. We walked the system from the city water connection to the steam header: makeup, pretreatment, deaerator, feed pumps, chemical feed points, boilers, and blowdown.

We reviewed the deaerator installation against basic venting practice, checked every chemical injection point against where that chemical has to work, and inspected the boiler waterside when it was opened.

The findings went into a written engineering report. Despite pressure from the installing contractor to soften the conclusions, the report stated what the evidence showed.

Chemistry Baseline
  • Feedwater dissolved oxygen about 4 ppm. A working deaerator is typically guaranteed to 7 ppb
  • Phosphate: 0 ppm in blowdown against a 25 ppm PO₄ target
  • Sulfite: 0 ppm in blowdown against a 3 ppm target
  • No measurable polymer residual
  • Makeup: Chicago city water at roughly 140 mg/L hardness as CaCO₃, fed straight to the deaerator
Mechanical Baseline
  • No water softener anywhere upstream of the deaerator
  • Deaerator vent run with two 90° bends before leaving the building
  • All treatment chemicals injected ahead of the deaerator from a single drum
  • Surface skimmer valve as the only automated blowdown; no bottom blowdown automation
  • Boiler opened: significant scale in the bottom half of the boiler
Root Cause Finding

A mechanical and installation problem, not a chemistry failure. A deaerator removes gases. It does not remove hardness. Hard makeup heated to saturation in the deaerator loses CO₂, its pH rises, and calcium carbonate drops out on the spray valves and trays. Phosphate injected ahead of the deaerator met that same calcium and precipitated there too. That is why the deaerator scaled in days and why no phosphate or polymer ever reached the boiler: the hardness load consumed the internal treatment before it arrived.

The oxygen problem had two causes. The restricted vent could not release the oxygen and non-condensable gases the deaerator was stripping, and fouled internals cut its scrubbing further. Sulfite fed ahead of the deaerator reacted with oxygen in the incoming water instead of polishing the last trace in the storage section. At roughly 8 ppm of sodium sulfite per ppm of oxygen, scavenging 4 ppm chemically is not a treatment program. Mechanical deaeration has to do the work. Chemistry only polishes.

The boiler scale followed directly. With hardness entering untreated and only a surface skimmer for blowdown, precipitated solids settled and stayed in the bottom of the boiler. Surface blowdown controls dissolved solids. Only bottom blowdown removes settled sludge.

  • Softener installed upstream of the deaerator, so hardness is removed before the water is heated
  • Deaerator vent re-engineered as a single vertical run straight from the deaerator out through the roof
  • Chemical feed moved from a one-drum to a three-drum format, each chemical fed where it works:
    • Sulfite through a new injection quill below the water line of the deaerator storage section
    • Boiler internal treatment into the boiler feedwater line
    • Steam line protection through an injection quill directly into the steam header
  • Automated ball valve added on the bottom blowdown, set to blow down periodically in addition to the skimmer
  • Installation and equipment costs covered by the mechanical contractor, and all warranties restored
~$98K
In new equipment costs avoided, not counting downtime, repeated deaerator cleanouts, or the boiler cleaning. Corrections paid by the installer, warranties restored.
Equipment Avoided
~$98K
Sulfite
0 → 3 ppm
Phosphate
0 → 25 ppm
Warranty
Restored
Results Delivered
  • Ended — the mechanical-versus-chemical argument with a written root cause
  • Stopped — deaerator scaling and the cleanouts every few days
  • Restored — every chemical reading to target, immediately and sustained
  • Protected — the boilers with softened makeup and bottom blowdown
Economics
  • New equipment avoided: ~$98,000
  • Softener, vent rework, feed changes, and blowdown valve paid by the mechanical contractor
  • New-equipment warranties reinstated
  • Chemical now goes where it works, instead of being consumed by hardness and oxygen upstream
A deaerator is not pretreatment for hardness, and a softener is not oxygen control. A boiler system on hard water needs both, vented and fed correctly. There is never a reason to stay stuck in a technical or contract argument when an independent consultant can bring wider perspective, field experience, and a definitive answer. That is what Industrial Water Advisory does, with the integrity you expect from someone who sells no chemistry and no equipment.

Free PDF Download

Get the full case study

Baseline, root cause, corrective actions, and results — one page.

Download PDF

Stuck between your contractor and your water treater?

Independent boiler, pretreatment, and cooling-water audits for industrial, food, and institutional plants. We walk the system, find the root cause, and put it in writing. No chemistry sold, no equipment sold.